The evaluation of your supervisory body

Your requirements - Our value proposition

We create value for the further development of your supervisory board

Why is a regular evaluation and self-assessment of the supervisory board useful?

The evaluation of the work of supervisory boards, also referred to as efficiency review, effectiveness review or (self-) assessment of the supervisory board's work, has established itself as an essential instrument of good corporate governance. It does more than simply check compliance with regulatory requirements and enables a fact-based, systematic and forward-looking further development of the supervisory board.

  • The strengths - but also the obstacles - of effective and future-oriented board work are identified and formulated.

  • The role and self-image of the supervisory board is sharpened.

  • All areas of responsibility of the supervisory board are reflected upon in order to further develop the board in a 360° perspective.

  • The competences for dealing with current challenges are identified and developed.

  • The working methods, discussion culture and interaction of the board are strengthened.

  • The cooperation and provision of information to the management board, investors and other stakeholders is expanded.

  • Best practice and benchmark comparisons support the board in classifying its working methods.

Download Broschüre

The evaluation of the work of supervisory boards, also referred to as efficiency review, effectiveness review or (self-) assessment of the supervisory board's work, has established itself as an essential instrument of good corporate governance. It does more than simply check compliance with regulatory requirements and enables a fact-based, systematic and forward-looking further development of the supervisory board.

The motives for an evaluation or self-assessment of the supervisory board are heterogeneous. In addition to the regulatory requirements resulting from section D. 12 of the GCGC for listed companies and from § 25d para. 11 nos. 3 and 4 of the German Banking Act (KWG) for credit institutions, the expectations of stakeholders regarding a regular evaluation of the functioning of the supervisory body play an important role. Structural and personnel changes in the board as well as the desire for further development or the need for a benchmark comparison are further motives to reflect on the status quo of the supervisory board's work and to initiate improvements through the evaluation. Last but not least, the change in supervisory board work has been discussed in many different ways for a long time. The current debate focuses in particular on the implications of corporate transformation processes for supervisory boards and their work. Supervisory boards use the evaluation to optimally prepare and adapt their work to the transformation processes.

Evaluation according to your needs.

ECBE designs the evaluation according to your needs. We ensure an efficient evaluation process, a comprehensive stocktaking with systematic compliance and best practice comparison as well as company-specific recommendations for action with a sense of proportion. The process and content of the evaluation are always adapted to your needs and the specific company situation. Whether standardised or individualised, tool-based evaluation or structured personal discussions or moderated workshops - our selectable services allow for a customised and calculable evaluation.

Interne Evaluierung 
mit dem ECBE-Tool
Fragebogenbasierte 
digitale Evaluierung
Persönliche
Interviews
Moderierter 
Workshop
Innovative evaluation process
Innovative, streamlined and time-saving evaluation process through digital approach and a resource-efficient participation of the company
Optional performance variations
Optional service variants ensure a customised evaluation tailored to the specific company situation
Standardised or individualised
Standardised approach supported by the ECBE tool or an evaluation entirely according to your needs
Compliance-Check & Best Practice-Analysis
Review of regulatory requirements (compliance) and status quo of committee work based on best practice requirements
Specific recommendations for action
Detailed and multi-dimensional evaluation with best practice matrix, performance indicators and benchmark analyses reveals actual situation with specific implications for action
360-degree perspective
Optional involvement of the board or management for an additional evaluation dimension and 360-degree perspective
Latest technology
The latest and secure technology with DSGVO-compliant information collection and the use of German servers meets the highest security standards
Independent and confidential
Independent and confidential evaluation with the principles of reliability, integrity and full confidentiality ensures the objectivity of the evaluation
Experienced and interdisciplinary team
Highly experienced, interdisciplinary and diverse project team with high standards of quality and personal integrity